A.S. v. L.H.S.
Spousal support under the interim order terminated on granting of the final divorce order by reason of the parties' agreement and the petitioner’s conduct and that portion of the judgment is statute barred; the interim child support order survived the final order under the Divorce Act interpretation protecting children’s rights, but all arrears that accumulated since the final order are cancelled as it would be grossly unfair to enforce them given the respondent's long‑term incapacity and impecuniosity; respondent is not required to pay child support at this time but must provide annual income information beginning May 1, 2004 until the children cease to be children under the Divorce Act.
- Citation
- 2004 BCSC 166
- Parties
- Petitioner: A.S.; Respondent: L.H.S.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce/family Law / Application to Set Aside Interim Order; Reasons for Judgment (decision)
- Outcome
- Application partly granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Orders, Final Orders, Child Support, Spousal Support, Arrears Cancellation, Limitation, Enforcement, Retroactivity, Family Relations Act S.96, Divorce Act S.15
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.S.
Petitioner
L.H.S.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce/family Law / Application to Set Aside Interim Order; Reasons for Judgment (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim support order made prior to final divorce survives the final order
- 2 Whether arrears, interest and penalties accumulated under the interim order should be cancelled
- 3 Whether spousal support terminated on final order by agreement and is statute barred
Ratio Decidendi
Spousal support under the interim order terminated on granting of the final divorce order by reason of the parties' agreement and the petitioner’s conduct and that portion of the judgment is statute barred; the interim child support order survived the final order under the Divorce Act interpretation protecting children’s rights, but all arrears that accumulated since the final order are cancelled as it would be grossly unfair to enforce them given the respondent's long‑term incapacity and impecuniosity; respondent is not required to pay child support at this time but must provide annual income information beginning May 1, 2004 until the children cease to be children under the Divorce Act.
Court Disposition
Application partly granted
Orders
- Interim spousal support order did not survive the final order and spousal support terminated upon the final order; the spousal portion of the judgment is statute barred under s.3(3) of the Limitation Act
- Interim child support order survived the final order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment