Canadian General Insurance v. Western Pile

Canadian General Insurance v. Western Pile

The completed operations exclusion applied because the insured's physical work (driving of piles) was completed when men and equipment were withdrawn on January 29, 1964; contractual obligations or intention to remedy defects do not prevent an operation being "completed," therefore the insurer was not liable for the resulting negligence claim.

Citation
[1972] SCR 175
Parties
Defendant/appellant: Canadian General Insurance Company; Plaintiff/respondent: Western Pile and Foundation (Ontario) Ltd.
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 June 1971
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of trial court restored; respondent's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Liability Insurance, Policy Exclusions, Completed Operations Exclusion, Negligence, Indemnity
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canadian General Insurance Company

Defendant/appellant

Western Pile and Foundation (Ontario) Ltd.

Plaintiff/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario

  1. 1 Whether the loss constituted an "accident" under the policy
  2. 2 Whether the policy's completed operations exclusion applied
  3. 3 Whether the endorsement limiting liability for work below the surface applied

Ratio Decidendi

The completed operations exclusion applied because the insured's physical work (driving of piles) was completed when men and equipment were withdrawn on January 29, 1964; contractual obligations or intention to remedy defects do not prevent an operation being "completed," therefore the insurer was not liable for the resulting negligence claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of trial court restored; respondent's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs
  • Judgment of the trial judge restored dismissing the respondent's claim for indemnity