EOS Canada Inc. v. Bennett
Section 5(1) of the Small Claims Court Act precludes a corporate assignee who is not an original party to the contract from bringing a claim in Small Claims Court; EOS is an assignee and not an original party to the Mastercard agreement with Canadian Tire Bank, therefore the Small Claims Court lacks jurisdiction and the claim must be dismissed (with the claimant free to reinitiate in Supreme Court).
- Citation
- 2019 NSSM 32
- Parties
- Claimant: EOS Canada Inc.; Defendant: Lilla K. Bennett
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Quick Judgment Application / Adjudication Decision
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under s.5(1) of the Small Claims Court Act
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Debt, Jurisdictional Bar Under Statute, Statutory Interpretation, Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EOS Canada Inc.
Claimant
Lilla K. Bennett
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Quick Judgment Application / Adjudication Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Small Claims Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim brought by an assignee of a debt
- 2 Whether section 5(1) of the Small Claims Court Act precludes a corporate assignee from succeeding in a small claims action when it is not an original party to the contract
- 3 What is the appropriate remedy if the court lacks jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
Section 5(1) of the Small Claims Court Act precludes a corporate assignee who is not an original party to the contract from bringing a claim in Small Claims Court; EOS is an assignee and not an original party to the Mastercard agreement with Canadian Tire Bank, therefore the Small Claims Court lacks jurisdiction and the claim must be dismissed (with the claimant free to reinitiate in Supreme Court).
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under s.5(1) of the Small Claims Court Act
Orders
- Claim dismissed.
- Claimant may reinitiate the claim in the Supreme Court if it chooses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment