Cité de Hull v. Syndicat des employés municipaux de la Cité de Hull Inc.
A lock-out in a public service ceases to be prohibited under s.97 when the employees’ association has acquired the right to strike under s.46, even if the association has not given the eight days’ prior notice required by s.99; s.99 regulates the exercise of the right to strike, not the employer’s right to lock-out.
- Citation
- [1979] 1 SCR 476
- Parties
- Appellant (employer, Public Service): Cité de Hull; Respondent (union): Le Syndicat des employés municipaux de la Cité de Hull Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (labour Law) / Final Appeal From Court of Appeal of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of the Court of Appeal set aside; judgments of the Superior Court and the Labour Court restored with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Lock Out, Right to Strike, Statutory Interpretation, Notice Requirements for Public Service Strikes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cité de Hull
Appellant (employer, Public Service)
Le Syndicat des employés municipaux de la Cité de Hull Inc.
Respondent (union)
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (labour Law) / Final Appeal From Court of Appeal of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employer may lawfully declare a lock-out in a public service after the s.46 sixty‑day period has elapsed but before the union has given the eight days’ prior notice required by s.99
- 2 Whether acquisition of the right to strike under s.46 carries with it the right to effect a lock-out by the employer in the context of public service employees
- 3 Whether s.97 prohibition on lock-outs is suspended only when an association has acquired the right to strike or only when strikes are not prohibited under s.99
Ratio Decidendi
A lock-out in a public service ceases to be prohibited under s.97 when the employees’ association has acquired the right to strike under s.46, even if the association has not given the eight days’ prior notice required by s.99; s.99 regulates the exercise of the right to strike, not the employer’s right to lock-out.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of the Court of Appeal set aside; judgments of the Superior Court and the Labour Court restored with costs.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Decision of the Court of Appeal set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment