Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. v. Brine
Court held insurer was entitled to recoup CPP/PSSA-derived overpayment but applied the policy to require pro‑rata apportionment of lump sums to the insured's 65th birthday rather than a 100% upfront clawback; promissory estoppel did not bar recoupment; bankrupty's discharge extinguished the remaining claimed balance because insured was not an ad hoc fiduciary (no undertaking of loyalty nor discretionary power); insurer breached duty of utmost good faith by arbitrarily suspending and failing to reinitiate rehabilitation without adequate medical inquiry, by withholding a critical IME (Rubens) for years, and by failing adequately to address taxability after a Tax Court decision; damages...
- Citation
- 2014 NSSC 219
- Parties
- Defendant (originally Plaintiff): Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.; Plaintiff (originally Defendant by Counterclaim): Bruce Brine
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Long Term Disability Insurance Dispute (contract and Bad Faith) / Trial Judgment (decision)
- Outcome
- Partial judgment for Bruce Brine on his counterclaim; partial judgment for Industrial Alliance on subrogation counterclaim; monetary awards entered as set out below
- Legal Topics
- Long Term Disability Benefits, Duty of Utmost Good Faith (insurer), Rehabilitation Benefits, Overpayment and Set Off, Subrogation, Promissory Estoppel, Bankruptcy Discharge S.178 BIA, Taxability of Benefits, Punitive and Aggravated Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.
Defendant (originally Plaintiff)
Bruce Brine
Plaintiff (originally Defendant by Counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Long Term Disability Insurance Dispute (contract and Bad Faith) / Trial Judgment (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was insurer entitled to recoup alleged overpayment from CPP and PSSA lump sums?
- 2 Was insurer estopped from recoupment by its communications?
- 3 Was insurer entitled to an upfront 100% clawback instead of pro-rating?
Ratio Decidendi
Court held insurer was entitled to recoup CPP/PSSA-derived overpayment but applied the policy to require pro‑rata apportionment of lump sums to the insured's 65th birthday rather than a 100% upfront clawback; promissory estoppel did not bar recoupment; bankrupty's discharge extinguished the remaining claimed balance because insured was not an ad hoc fiduciary (no undertaking of loyalty nor discretionary power); insurer breached duty of utmost good faith by arbitrarily suspending and failing to reinitiate rehabilitation without adequate medical inquiry, by withholding a critical IME (Rubens) for years, and by failing adequately to address taxability after a Tax Court decision; damages...
Court Disposition
Partial judgment for Bruce Brine on his counterclaim; partial judgment for Industrial Alliance on subrogation counterclaim; monetary awards entered as set out below
Orders
- Industrial Alliance to pay Bruce Brine CAD 62,036.81 for repayment of amounts wrongfully withheld (breach of contract)
- Industrial Alliance to pay Bruce Brine CAD 30,000.00 for mental distress arising from breach of contract
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment