Longshoremen's Union Cupe Local 375 v. Federal Marine Terminals Ltd.
The Court was not satisfied that there was any error in the reasons of Teitelbaum J. that could justify intervention; accordingly the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2001 FCA 363
- Parties
- Appellant: Longshoremen's Union, CUPE Local 375; Respondent: Federal Marine Terminals Limited, Fednav Division, Montréal, Quebec
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Trial Division Order (t 938 99, April 26, 2000) / Hearing and Judgment Delivered From the Bench at Federal Court of Appeal (november 22, 2001)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Standard of Review, Costs, Appellate Intervention
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Longshoremen's Union, CUPE Local 375
Appellant
Federal Marine Terminals Limited, Fednav Division, Montréal, Quebec
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Trial Division Order (t 938 99, April 26, 2000) / Hearing and Judgment Delivered From the Bench at Federal Court of Appeal (november 22, 2001)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was any error in the Trial Division reasons of Teitelbaum J. warranting appellate intervention
- 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed and costs awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied that there was any error in the reasons of Teitelbaum J. that could justify intervention; accordingly the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Longshoremen's Union Cupe Local 375 v. Federal Marine Terminals Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-11-22 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 363 File numbers A-349-00 Decision Content Date: 20011122 Docket: A-349-00 Montréal, Quebec, November 22, 2001 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LONGSHOREMEN'S UNION, CUPE LOCAL 375 Appellant and FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS LIMITED, FEDNAV DIVISION, MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC Respondent JUDGMENT The appeal is dismissed with costs. "J. Richard" C.J. Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. Date: 20011122 Docket: A-349-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 363 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LONGSHOREMEN'S UNION, CUPE LOCAL 375 Appellant and FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS LIMITED, FEDNAV DIVISION, MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on November 22, 2001 Judgment from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 22, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J. Date: 20011122 Docket: A-349-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 363 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LONGSHOREMEN'S UNION, CUPE LOCAL 375 Appellant and FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS LIMITED, FEDNAV DIVISION, MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on November 22, 2001) RICHARD C.J. [1] Despite the able argument by Mr. Roy, the Court was not satisfied that there was any error in the reasons of Teitelbaum J. that could justify its intervention. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "J. Richard" C.J. Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20011122 Docket: A-349-00 Between: LONGSHOREMEN'S UNION, CUPE LOCAL 375 Appellant and FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS LIMITED, FEDNAV DIVISION, MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD FILE: A-349-00 Appeal from order made by Trial Division in file T-938-99 on April 26, 2000 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. STYLE OF CAUSE: LONGSHOREMEN'S UNION, CUPE LOCAL 375 Appellant and FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS LIMITED, FEDNAV DIVISION, MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: November 22, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J. DATED: November 22, 2001 APPEARANCE: Laurent Roy FOR THE APPELLANT Patrick L. Benaroche FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Trudel, Nadeau FOR THE APPELLANT Montréal, Quebec Stikeman, Elliott FOR THE RESPONDENT Montréal, Quebec