Odim Export v. Doucet

Odim Export v. Doucet

Claimant breached the contract by abandoning communication and failing to pay; the defendants acted within reasonable bounds to mitigate damages by eventually reselling the goods; therefore the claimant is not entitled to cancel the contract or recover deposits and the claim is dismissed.

Citation
2012 NSSM 18
Parties
Claimant: Alfred Banigo carrying on business as Odim Export; Defendant: Louis Doucet; Defendant: Louis Doucet Enterprises Ltd.
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Sale of Goods / Decision (reasons for Decision)
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Mitigation of Damages, Right to Cancel Contract, Resale of Goods by Seller, Deposit Forfeiture, Acceptance and Delivery
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Banigo carrying on business as Odim Export

Claimant

Louis Doucet

Defendant

Louis Doucet Enterprises Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court Sale of Goods / Decision (reasons for Decision)

  1. 1 Whether the claimant had a right to cancel or suspend the contract due to personal detention
  2. 2 Whether the defendants acted reasonably in mitigating damages after the buyer became unreachable
  3. 3 Whether the claimant breached the contract by failing to pay and accept delivery

Ratio Decidendi

Claimant breached the contract by abandoning communication and failing to pay; the defendants acted within reasonable bounds to mitigate damages by eventually reselling the goods; therefore the claimant is not entitled to cancel the contract or recover deposits and the claim is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim dismissed