Cridge v. Canada

Cridge v. Canada

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the Income Tax Act was unconstitutional or that the Tax Court judge erred; accordingly the reassessment disallowing the claimed deductions and bad debt allowance was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2016 FCA 87
Parties
Appellant: Lovey Cridge; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (reassessment Under Income Tax Act) / Decision on Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Reassessment, Deductibility of Expenses, Bad Debt Allowance, Constitutional Validity of Statute, Costs
Source Language
en
Taxation Constitutional Law Appellate Procedure Reassessment Deductibility of Expenses Bad Debt Allowance Constitutional Validity of Statute Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lovey Cridge

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal (reassessment Under Income Tax Act) / Decision on Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Income Tax Act is constitutional such that the reassessment is valid
  2. 2 Whether the Tax Court judge erred in dismissing the appeal regarding disallowed deductions and a bad debt allowance

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the Income Tax Act was unconstitutional or that the Tax Court judge erred; accordingly the reassessment disallowing the claimed deductions and bad debt allowance was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs awarded to the respondent in the amount of $500 inclusive