Doucette v. Lyndon Lynch Architects Ltd.
No binding contract existed because there was no offer and acceptance and no tender was issued; because there was no contract the agency issue did not arise and the claimant's reliance on public announcements lacked evidentiary foundation, so the claim fails.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2011 NSSM 1
- Parties
- Claimant: Philip R Doucette; Defendant: Lydon Lynch Architects Limited; Defendant: Halifax City Farmers’ Market Cooperative Limited
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Decision
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Apparent Authority, Agency, Design Services, Agreement to Agree
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip R Doucette
Claimant
Lydon Lynch Architects Limited
Defendant
Halifax City Farmers’ Market Cooperative Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract existed between the claimant and the defendant
- 2 Whether Lydon Lynch had actual or apparent authority to bind Halifax City Farmers’ Market Cooperative Limited
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to design fees absent a completed contract or tender
Ratio Decidendi
No binding contract existed because there was no offer and acceptance and no tender was issued; because there was no contract the agency issue did not arise and the claimant's reliance on public announcements lacked evidentiary foundation, so the claim fails.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- Action dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment