R. v. McKay
Leave to appeal sentence was granted but the appeal was dismissed because the trial judge, experienced with Aboriginal offenders, obtained a pre-sentence report with a Gladue component, applied Gladue principles notwithstanding an imprecise remark, and the fresh Gladue evidence did not materially add to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2010 ONCA 323
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen; Appellant: Lyndon Thomas Alex McKay; Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen (represented)
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Leave to Appeal Sentence (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Gladue Principles, Pre Sentence Report, Fresh Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Respondent
Lyndon Thomas Alex McKay
Appellant
Her Majesty The Queen (represented)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Leave to Appeal Sentence (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misapplied Gladue principles at sentencing
- 2 Whether a more complete Gladue report filed as fresh evidence materially alters the sentencing analysis
- 3 Whether the sentence was demonstrably unfit given the seriousness of the sexual assault
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal sentence was granted but the appeal was dismissed because the trial judge, experienced with Aboriginal offenders, obtained a pre-sentence report with a Gladue component, applied Gladue principles notwithstanding an imprecise remark, and the fresh Gladue evidence did not materially add to the information before the sentencing judge; given the gravity of the repeated forced sexual acts and their impact, there was no basis to interfere with the sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Sentence of 3 years and 4 months (in addition to 83 days of pre-trial custody) upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. McKay Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2010-05-03 Neutral citation 2010 ONCA 323 Docket numbers C51358 Judges Sharpe, Robert J.; Blair, Robert Ashley; MacFarland, Jean Louise Subject Criminal Decision Content CITATION: R. v. McKay, 2010 ONCA 323 DATE: 20100503 DOCKET: C51358 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Sharpe, Blair and MacFarland JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and Lyndon Thomas Alex McKay Appellant Jonathan Rudin and Mandy Wesley, for the appellant Michelle Campbell, for the respondent Heard & endorsed orally: April 29, 2010 On appeal from the sentence imposed by Justice P.T. Bishop of the Ontario Court of Justice dated July 20, 2009. ENDORSEMENT [1] The appellant seeks leave to appeal his sentence of 3 years and 4 months (in addition to 83 days of pre-trial custody) imposed following his plea of guilty to sexual assault. [2] We do not accept the submission that the trial judge erred with respect to the principles of R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688. [3] The trial judge, very experienced in the area of dealing with aboriginal offenders, recognized the need for a Gladue report. He requested and obtained a pre-sentence report with a Gladue component to ensure that he had the relevant Gladue information especially as alcohol was a factor in this offence. [4] We agree that the trial judge’s statement that the more serious the offence, the less applicable are the Gladue considerations is not an accurate reflection of the law: see R. v. Wells, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 207. However, we are satisfied that, at the end of the day, the trial judge applied Gladue correctly and that he did take the Gladue factors into account. [5] In our view, the more complete Gladue report prepared for this appeal as fresh evidence does not materially add to the information that was before the trial judge. The fresh evidence elaborates many of the problems and challenges faced by aboriginal people, but it does not add significantly to this offender’s background. The trial judge was aware of the appellant’s early suicide attempt and of the fact that he was raised by his grandparents. The fresh evidence does relate an incident of sexual abuse suffered by the appellant, but we are not persuaded that that incident had any meaningful bearing on this offence. [6] While alcohol was certainly a factor in this offence, the appellant does not appear to have a history of alcohol abuse. He was in a responsible position as a teacher’s assistant in the same school where the victim worked as a teacher. [7] This was a very serious sexual assault involving repeated acts of forced anal and vaginal sex that had a devastating and enduring impact on the victim and her family. [8] We are not persuaded that there is any basis upon which we can interfere with the sentence. Accordingly, leave to appeal sentence is granted, but the appeal is dismissed. “Robert J. Sharpe J.A.” “R.A. Blair J.A.” “J. MacFarland J.A.”