R. v. DeRoach

R. v. DeRoach

The detention was not arbitrary because the officer lawfully exercised authority under the Motor Vehicle Act to stop the vehicle to check sobriety; the officer’s observation (a slight stumble) and stated purpose satisfied the statutory aim and no reasonable suspicion threshold was required for a roadside sobriety stop, so s.9 was not breached.

Citation
2021 NSPC 44
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: M. DeRoach
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Charter S.9 Voir Dire/decision
Outcome
Application denied; detention not arbitrary; breathalyzer evidence admissible.
Legal Topics
Arbitrary Detention, Charter S.9, Roadside Sobriety Stops, Motor Vehicle Act, Reasonable Suspicion, Exclusion of Evidence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

M. DeRoach

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Charter S.9 Voir Dire/decision

  1. 1 Whether the stop of the vehicle constituted an arbitrary detention contrary to s.9 of the Charter
  2. 2 Whether an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a roadside stop to check sobriety
  3. 3 Whether breathalyzer readings should be excluded due to an alleged s.9 breach

Ratio Decidendi

The detention was not arbitrary because the officer lawfully exercised authority under the Motor Vehicle Act to stop the vehicle to check sobriety; the officer’s observation (a slight stumble) and stated purpose satisfied the statutory aim and no reasonable suspicion threshold was required for a roadside sobriety stop, so s.9 was not breached.

Court Disposition

Application denied; detention not arbitrary; breathalyzer evidence admissible.

Orders

  • Application to exclude breathalyzer readings dismissed