Humby Enterprises Limited v. RE

Humby Enterprises Limited v. RE

The motions were dismissed because injunctive relief failed as the Applicant did not establish a serious issue or irreparable harm, and mandamus was unavailable since the JEA vests the Sheriff with discretionary authority under s.80(2) to release seized goods such that there was no public legal duty to compel sale; challenges to the exercise of that discretion must proceed by judicial review to challenge the Sheriff’s decision-making, not by mandamus on a motion.

Citation
2007 FC 1085
Parties
Judgment Debtor: Humby Enterprises Limited; Judgment Debtor: A & E Precision Fabricating and Machine Shop Inc.; Judgment Debtor: Central Springs Limited; Applicant/creditor: Canada Revenue Agency (Minister of National Revenue); Enforcement Officer/sheriff: High Sheriff of Newfoundland and Labrador
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of Tax Assessments; Motions for Injunction and Mandamus Under Federal Courts Act and Provincial Judgment Enforcement Act / Motion Hearing and Decision (motions Dismissed)
Outcome
Motions dismissed
Legal Topics
Mandamus, Injunction, Commercially Reasonable Manner, Writ of Seizure and Sale, Judgment Enforcement, Judicial Review
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Tax Law Enforcement of Judgments Civil Remedies Mandamus Injunction Commercially Reasonable Manner Writ of Seizure and Sale +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Humby Enterprises Limited

Judgment Debtor

A & E Precision Fabricating and Machine Shop Inc.

Judgment Debtor

Central Springs Limited

Judgment Debtor

Canada Revenue Agency (Minister of National Revenue)

Applicant/creditor

High Sheriff of Newfoundland and Labrador

Enforcement Officer/sheriff

Procedural Posture

Enforcement of Tax Assessments; Motions for Injunction and Mandamus Under Federal Courts Act and Provincial Judgment Enforcement Act / Motion Hearing and Decision (motions Dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Sheriff had a public legal duty to sell the seized goods
  2. 2 Whether mandamus is available to compel the Sheriff to sell
  3. 3 Whether injunctive relief should issue to prevent return of goods

Ratio Decidendi

The motions were dismissed because injunctive relief failed as the Applicant did not establish a serious issue or irreparable harm, and mandamus was unavailable since the JEA vests the Sheriff with discretionary authority under s.80(2) to release seized goods such that there was no public legal duty to compel sale; challenges to the exercise of that discretion must proceed by judicial review to challenge the Sheriff’s decision-making, not by mandamus on a motion.

Court Disposition

Motions dismissed

Orders

  • Motions dismissed with taxed costs to the Respondents
  • Applicant's requests for solicitor-client costs and for damages dismissed