Mississauga (City) v. Singh

Mississauga (City) v. Singh

The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Justice of the Peace committed a jurisdictional error by failing to properly consider and apply the statutory factors in s.34(4) and the principles from Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. N.M.C. Canada Inc., instead deciding the matter on a view of the fairness of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C41248
Parties
Appellant: MANJIT SINGH; Respondent: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Superior Court Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Superior Court order of Justice John R. Belleghem dated November 3, 2003 setting aside the Justice of the Peace's order is upheld
Legal Topics
Amendment of Charges Under Provincial Offences Act, Judicial Discretion, Jurisdictional Error, Quashing of Certificate of Offence
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Municipal Law Provincial Offences Amendment of Charges Under Provincial Offences Act Judicial Discretion Jurisdictional Error Quashing of Certificate of Offence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MANJIT SINGH

Appellant

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Superior Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the Justice of the Peace properly exercised her discretion under s.34(4) of the Provincial Offences Act to amend the certificate of offence
  2. 2 Whether the Justice of the Peace committed a jurisdictional error by deciding based on perceived fairness of the legislative scheme and s.9 of the Provincial Offences Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Justice of the Peace committed a jurisdictional error by failing to properly consider and apply the statutory factors in s.34(4) and the principles from Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. N.M.C. Canada Inc., instead deciding the matter on a view of the fairness of the legislative scheme; the Superior Court's setting aside of the quashing order was correct and must be upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Superior Court order of Justice John R. Belleghem dated November 3, 2003 setting aside the Justice of the Peace's order is upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Order of Justice John R. Belleghem dated November 3, 2003 upheld