Akran v. Toronto Dominion Bank
The appeal was dismissed because the Court found no error in the order below, and accordingly the respondent was awarded costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 ONCA 528
- Parties
- Appellant: Manouchehr Akran; Respondent: The Toronto Dominion Bank
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Collection / Appeal Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Costs, Judicial Review of Lower Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manouchehr Akran
Appellant
The Toronto Dominion Bank
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court erred in its order
- 2 Whether the appeal should be allowed
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the Court found no error in the order below, and accordingly the respondent was awarded costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs to the respondent fixed at $2000 in total.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Akran v. Toronto Dominion Bank Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2013-08-23 Neutral citation 2013 ONCA 528 Docket numbers C56876 Judges Goudge, Stephen Thomas; Watt, David; Pepall, Sarah E. Subject Civil Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Akran v. Toronto Dominion Bank, 2013 ONCA 528 DATE: 20130823 DOCKET: C56876 Goudge, Watt and Pepall JJ.A. BETWEEN Manouchehr Akran Applicant (Appellant) and The Toronto Dominion Bank Respondent (Respondent) Richard Parker, for the appellant Nicole Brown Dunbar, for the respondent Heard: August 22, 2013 On appeal from the judgment of Justice Leonard Ricchetti of the Superior Court of Justice, dated September 21, 2011. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We see no basis upon which the appeal could be allowed. There is no error in the order below. The appeal is dismissed. [2] Costs to the respondent fixed at $2000 in total.