R. v. Fraser

R. v. Fraser

Because the sentencing reasons did not disclose whether pre-sentence custody was taken into account, the reasons reflected an error in principle; leave to appeal was granted, the appeal was allowed and the robbery sentence was reduced by 80 days.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 197
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen; Appellant: Mansa Adisa Fraser
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence on robbery charge reduced by 80 days.
Legal Topics
Pre Sentence Custody, Error in Principle, Leave to Appeal, Sentence Reduction, Robbery
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Pre Sentence Custody Error in Principle Leave to Appeal Sentence Reduction Robbery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

Mansa Adisa Fraser

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to advert to pre-sentence custody
  2. 2 Whether the failure to disclose consideration of pre-sentence custody constitutes an error in principle warranting appellate intervention

Ratio Decidendi

Because the sentencing reasons did not disclose whether pre-sentence custody was taken into account, the reasons reflected an error in principle; leave to appeal was granted, the appeal was allowed and the robbery sentence was reduced by 80 days.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence on robbery charge reduced by 80 days.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal allowed