Burris v. Disabled Consumer Association of Colchester

Burris v. Disabled Consumer Association of Colchester

The Court dismissed the appeal, concluding the trial judge did not err: no duty of care was owed on the facts; alternatively, if a duty arose the respondents took reasonable steps; and residual policy considerations would prevent imposing tort liability.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 NSCA 62
Parties
Appellant: Margaret Bernadette Louise Burris; Respondent: Disabled Consumer Society of Colchester; Respondent: Kinsmen & Kinette Club of Canada, Truro Club
Court
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (tort/negligence) / Appeal to Court of Appeal After Liability Trial
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Negligence, Policy Considerations, Standard of Care, Appeal Standard of Review
Source Language
en
Tort Civil Procedure Duty of Care Negligence Policy Considerations Standard of Care Appeal Standard of Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Bernadette Louise Burris

Appellant

Disabled Consumer Society of Colchester

Respondent

Kinsmen & Kinette Club of Canada, Truro Club

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (tort/negligence) / Appeal to Court of Appeal After Liability Trial

  1. 1 Whether the respondents owed a duty of care to the appellant
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in law or made palpable and overriding errors of fact
  3. 3 Whether respondents took reasonable steps to satisfy any duty of care

Ratio Decidendi

The Court dismissed the appeal, concluding the trial judge did not err: no duty of care was owed on the facts; alternatively, if a duty arose the respondents took reasonable steps; and residual policy considerations would prevent imposing tort liability.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs of $2,000.00 inclusive of disbursements awarded to each respondent