Laframboise v. Vallières
The wife’s renunciations in the deed of sale — both of her future-life usufruct (a donation a cause de mort) and of the hypothec securing the monetary gift — were valid. A donation a cause de mort does not prevent the husband from alienating the property during his life, art.1301 C.C. does not apply because the wife...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1927] SCR 193
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Léon Laframboise; Respondent / Plaintiff: Dame Vitaline Vallières
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 1927
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal — Family Law / Matrimonial Property (marriage Contract, Hypothec, Usufruct) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King’s Bench (quebec)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; judgment below setting aside the sale was reversed; plaintiff’s action dismissed as to the sale; sale validated.
- Legal Topics
- Marriage Contract, Renunciation, Hypothec (mortgage), Usufruct, Donation a Cause De Mort, Article 1265 C.c., Article 1301 C.c.
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Léon Laframboise
Appellant / Defendant
Dame Vitaline Vallières
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal — Family Law / Matrimonial Property (marriage Contract, Hypothec, Usufruct) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King’s Bench (quebec)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a married wife may validly renounce rights of habitation and usufruct granted by a registered marriage contract by joining in a deed of sale executed by her husband
- 2 Whether a wife’s renunciation of a hypothec (mortgage) granted in a marriage contract to secure a gift inter vivos is valid
- 3 Whether such renunciations contravene article 1265 C.C. (prohibition on changes to matrimonial conventions)
Ratio Decidendi
The wife’s renunciations in the deed of sale — both of her future-life usufruct (a donation a cause de mort) and of the hypothec securing the monetary gift — were valid. A donation a cause de mort does not prevent the husband from alienating the property during his life, art.1301 C.C. does not apply because the wife did not bind herself with or for her husband, and art.1265 C.C. does not bar a wife from renouncing her own droits in favour of a third party where such renunciation does not alter the essential matrimonial conventions or impose liability on the husband.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment below setting aside the sale was reversed; plaintiff’s action dismissed as to the sale; sale validated.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs.
- Judgment of the Superior Court setting aside the sale set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment