Laframboise v. Vallières

Laframboise v. Vallières

The wife’s renunciations in the deed of sale — both of her future-life usufruct (a donation a cause de mort) and of the hypothec securing the monetary gift — were valid. A donation a cause de mort does not prevent the husband from alienating the property during his life, art.1301 C.C. does not apply because the wife...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1927] SCR 193
Parties
Appellant / Defendant: Léon Laframboise; Respondent / Plaintiff: Dame Vitaline Vallières
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 February 1927
Procedural Posture
Appeal — Family Law / Matrimonial Property (marriage Contract, Hypothec, Usufruct) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King’s Bench (quebec)
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment below setting aside the sale was reversed; plaintiff’s action dismissed as to the sale; sale validated.
Legal Topics
Marriage Contract, Renunciation, Hypothec (mortgage), Usufruct, Donation a Cause De Mort, Article 1265 C.c., Article 1301 C.c.
Source Language
english
Family Law Property Law Succession Law Contract Law Marriage Contract Renunciation Hypothec (mortgage) Usufruct +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Léon Laframboise

Appellant / Defendant

Dame Vitaline Vallières

Respondent / Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal — Family Law / Matrimonial Property (marriage Contract, Hypothec, Usufruct) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King’s Bench (quebec)

  1. 1 Whether a married wife may validly renounce rights of habitation and usufruct granted by a registered marriage contract by joining in a deed of sale executed by her husband
  2. 2 Whether a wife’s renunciation of a hypothec (mortgage) granted in a marriage contract to secure a gift inter vivos is valid
  3. 3 Whether such renunciations contravene article 1265 C.C. (prohibition on changes to matrimonial conventions)

Ratio Decidendi

The wife’s renunciations in the deed of sale — both of her future-life usufruct (a donation a cause de mort) and of the hypothec securing the monetary gift — were valid. A donation a cause de mort does not prevent the husband from alienating the property during his life, art.1301 C.C. does not apply because the wife did not bind herself with or for her husband, and art.1265 C.C. does not bar a wife from renouncing her own droits in favour of a third party where such renunciation does not alter the essential matrimonial conventions or impose liability on the husband.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs; judgment below setting aside the sale was reversed; plaintiff’s action dismissed as to the sale; sale validated.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs.
  • Judgment of the Superior Court setting aside the sale set aside.