United States v. Foley

United States v. Foley

The Court held the Minister's surrender decision was not unreasonable and dismissed the application for judicial review.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2014 ONCA 388
Parties
Applicant: Martin Foley; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of the United States of America
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Extradition Judicial Review Under S.57 of the Extradition Act / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Judicial Review of Minister's Surrender Order
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed; Minister's surrender order upheld.
Legal Topics
Section 7 Charter, Section 6(1) Charter, Section 44 Extradition Act, Judicial Review Reasonableness, Surrender Order
Source Language
en
Criminal Extradition Constitutional Law Administrative Law Section 7 Charter Section 6(1) Charter Section 44 Extradition Act Judicial Review Reasonableness +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Foley

Applicant

The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of the United States of America

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extradition Judicial Review Under S.57 of the Extradition Act / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Judicial Review of Minister's Surrender Order

  1. 1 Whether the Minister's decision to surrender the applicant was unreasonable
  2. 2 Whether surrender would violate s.7 and s.6(1) of the Charter and s.44 of the Extradition Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held the Minister's surrender decision was not unreasonable and dismissed the application for judicial review.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed; Minister's surrender order upheld.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed.
  • Minister's surrender order dated November 6, 2013 upheld.