R. v. Jafarian

R. v. Jafarian

The trial judge erred in principle by using sentencing to criticize appellate direction; the appropriate sentence for the offences was 15 months with 30 days credit for pre-trial custody resulting in an effective sentence of 14 months, emphasizing denunciation and specific deterrence for repeated breaches of court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2014 ONCA 9
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Masoud Jafarian
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence reduced.
Legal Topics
Breach of Court Order, Criminal Harassment, Denunciation, Specific Deterrence, Credit for Pre Trial Custody
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Domestic Violence/harassment Breach of Court Order Criminal Harassment Denunciation Specific Deterrence Credit for Pre Trial Custody

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Masoud Jafarian

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for repeated breaches of court orders and criminal harassment
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred by using sentencing to critique appellate direction
  3. 3 Appropriate credit for pre-trial custody

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge erred in principle by using sentencing to criticize appellate direction; the appropriate sentence for the offences was 15 months with 30 days credit for pre-trial custody resulting in an effective sentence of 14 months, emphasizing denunciation and specific deterrence for repeated breaches of court orders.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence reduced.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal allowed