R. v. Jafarian
The trial judge erred in principle by using sentencing to criticize appellate direction; the appropriate sentence for the offences was 15 months with 30 days credit for pre-trial custody resulting in an effective sentence of 14 months, emphasizing denunciation and specific deterrence for repeated breaches of court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 ONCA 9
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Masoud Jafarian
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Court Order, Criminal Harassment, Denunciation, Specific Deterrence, Credit for Pre Trial Custody
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Masoud Jafarian
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for repeated breaches of court orders and criminal harassment
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred by using sentencing to critique appellate direction
- 3 Appropriate credit for pre-trial custody
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in principle by using sentencing to criticize appellate direction; the appropriate sentence for the offences was 15 months with 30 days credit for pre-trial custody resulting in an effective sentence of 14 months, emphasizing denunciation and specific deterrence for repeated breaches of court orders.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence reduced.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Jafarian Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2014-01-10 Neutral citation 2014 ONCA 9 Docket numbers C57629 Judges Doherty, David H.; Sharpe, Robert J.; MacFarland, Jean Louise Subject Criminal Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Jafarian, 2014 ONCA 9 DATE: 20140108 DOCKET: C57629 Doherty, Sharpe and MacFarland JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Respondent and Masoud Jafarian Appellant Mark C. Halfyard, for the appellant Stacey D. Young, for the respondent Heard: December 20, 2013 On appeal from the sentence imposed on June 20, 2013 by Justice Howard I. Chisvin of the Ontario Court of Justice. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The appellant pled guilty to breaches of outstanding court orders and a charge of criminal harassment. He has several prior convictions for breaches of court orders. All of the breaches arise out of court orders forbidding direct or indirect contact with his former wife. [2] We agree with the trial judge that the time had come to impose a denunciatory sentence. Specific deterrence had to be the primary purpose of the sentence. This court has imposed mid-range reformatory sentences in similar cases. [3] However, the trial judge erred in principle in using the sentencing of the appellant as an opportunity to send a message that sentences for this kind of offences were “ridiculously low” because of the direction of this court. The trial judge is obliged to accept the direction of this court and should have concentrated on the specifics of the offence and the circumstances of the offender. [4] We think that the submission made by the Crown at trial accurately reflected the appropriate range of sentence – that is 12 to 15 months. We think a sentence of 15 months would be appropriate. The Crown and defence agree that the respondent is entitled to 30 days credit for pre-trial custody resulting in a sentence of 14 months. [5] Leave to appeal is granted, the appeal is allowed and the sentence is reduced accordingly.