R. v. Billard

R. v. Billard

The 21-day detention sentence was not illegal or demonstrably unfit; the Military Judge committed no error in principle or omission of relevant factors and the custodial sentence was appropriate given the soldier‑first obligation and the need for denunciation and deterrence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 CMAC 4
Parties
Appellant: Master Corporal Paul Patrick Billard; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
25 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Court Martial Appeal / Leave to Appeal; Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Neglect to the Prejudice of Good Order and Discipline, Obedience to Lawful Orders, Denunciation and Deterrence, Soldier First Principle
Source Language
en
Military Law Criminal Law Sentencing Law Neglect to the Prejudice of Good Order and Discipline Obedience to Lawful Orders Denunciation and Deterrence Soldier First Principle

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Master Corporal Paul Patrick Billard

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Court Martial Appeal / Leave to Appeal; Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the 21-day detention sentence was illegal or demonstrably unfit
  2. 2 Whether the Military Judge erred in principle or failed to consider relevant factors on sentence
  3. 3 Application of the 'soldier first principle' and the necessity of obedience to lawful orders during an attack

Ratio Decidendi

The 21-day detention sentence was not illegal or demonstrably unfit; the Military Judge committed no error in principle or omission of relevant factors and the custodial sentence was appropriate given the soldier‑first obligation and the need for denunciation and deterrence.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal allowed
  • Appeal dismissed and sentence of 21 days detention upheld