Hossack v. Shaw
The agreed high monthly interest rate did not bind the borrowers after maturity of the obligations unless the contract explicitly so stipulated; any excessive interest paid after maturity was voluntary and not recoverable, and recoverable interest after maturity is limited to the statutory rate of 5% per annum unless a higher post‑maturity rate is clearly stipulated. Respondents were not money‑lenders under the Acts and the Money‑Lenders Acts did not render the transactions void.
- Citation
- (1918) 56 SCR 581
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Donald C. Hossack; Appellant/defendant: Lucinda E. Hossack; Respondent/plaintiff: John E. Shaw; Respondent/plaintiff: Frank E. Shaw
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Contract (loan/promissory Notes) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Appellate Division modified
- Legal Topics
- Maturity of Loan, Post‑maturity Interest, Voluntary Payment, Money‑lenders Definition, Unconscionability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald C. Hossack
Appellant/defendant
Lucinda E. Hossack
Appellant/defendant
John E. Shaw
Respondent/plaintiff
Frank E. Shaw
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Contract (loan/promissory Notes) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents were 'money‑lenders' within the meaning of the Ontario Money‑Lenders Act or Dominion Interest Act
- 2 Whether a contractual stipulation of interest 'until paid' (2½%/2% per month) binds borrower to that rate after maturity
- 3 Whether excessive interest paid after maturity is recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The agreed high monthly interest rate did not bind the borrowers after maturity of the obligations unless the contract explicitly so stipulated; any excessive interest paid after maturity was voluntary and not recoverable, and recoverable interest after maturity is limited to the statutory rate of 5% per annum unless a higher post‑maturity rate is clearly stipulated. Respondents were not money‑lenders under the Acts and the Money‑Lenders Acts did not render the transactions void.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Appellate Division modified
Orders
- Modify judgment to compute interest after maturity at 5% per annum unless a higher post‑maturity rate is clearly stipulated in the respective contracts
- If parties cannot agree on computation, refer the amount to the registrar for determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment