Valinski v. Bacon / In re Webber
The en banc order of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia purporting to extend the Rule 72 period was made without jurisdiction; Rule 72's thirty‑day limit is jurisdictional such that a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada had no jurisdiction to entertain the out‑of‑time application and the application must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [1931] SCR 498
- Parties
- Applicant: Max Valinsky; Respondent/trustee: G. R. Bacon; Debtor/assignor: Louis Webber
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 1931
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy — Application for Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / In Chambers — Application for Special Leave to Appeal From Decision of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia En Banc
- Outcome
- Application for special leave dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Jurisdiction to Grant Leave to Appeal, Statutory Time Limits, Bankruptcy Rules
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Max Valinsky
Applicant
G. R. Bacon
Respondent/trustee
Louis Webber
Debtor/assignor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy — Application for Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / In Chambers — Application for Special Leave to Appeal From Decision of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia En Banc
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a court can extend the 30‑day period in Bankruptcy Rule 72 for applying for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia en banc had jurisdiction to extend that time
- 3 Whether a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada has jurisdiction to entertain an application made after the Rule 72 period
Ratio Decidendi
The en banc order of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia purporting to extend the Rule 72 period was made without jurisdiction; Rule 72's thirty‑day limit is jurisdictional such that a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada had no jurisdiction to entertain the out‑of‑time application and the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for special leave dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment