C.L. v. C.C.
Although the respondent's income decreased on retirement, he retains some ability to pay and the petitioner continues to have a demonstrated need; therefore the spousal support order should be varied downward rather than cancelled.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 BCSC 140
- Parties
- Petitioner: J.P.G.P.; Respondent: M.B.P.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Variation of Spousal Support / Application to Cancel or Vary Spousal Support
- Outcome
- Application to cancel spousal support denied; order varied to reduce support.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Support, Retirement and Support Obligations, Ability to Pay, Entitlement to Support, Income and Needs Assessment
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J.P.G.P.
Petitioner
M.B.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Variation of Spousal Support / Application to Cancel or Vary Spousal Support
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether spousal support obligation should be cancelled following respondent's retirement and reduced income
- 2 Whether respondent retains ability to pay spousal support despite reduced income
- 3 Whether petitioner continues to have need and entitlement to support
Ratio Decidendi
Although the respondent's income decreased on retirement, he retains some ability to pay and the petitioner continues to have a demonstrated need; therefore the spousal support order should be varied downward rather than cancelled.
Court Disposition
Application to cancel spousal support denied; order varied to reduce support.
Orders
- Application to cancel spousal support dismissed.
- Respondent shall pay spousal support in the amount of $500 per month effective October 1, 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment