Hyde (Re)
The court denied the media's request for copies of the expert reports and permitted on-site, supervised review only because the inquiry's custodial control over exhibits, the risk of misrepresentation and decontextualization of expert evidence, and existing public access via webcasting together justify restricting publication and copying while preserving open proceedings.
- Citation
- 2010 NSPC 21
- Parties
- Acting Inquiry Counsel: Charles Broderick; Attorney General: Attorney General of Nova Scotia; Interested Parties: Joanna Blair and Dr. Hunter Blair; Union Intervener: Nova Scotia Government and General Employees' Union; Police: Halifax Regional Police; Health Authority: Capital District Health Authority; Physician/interested Party: Dr. Janet MacIntyre; Physician/interested Party: Dr. Stephen Curry; Non Governmental Organization: Schizophrenia Society of Nova Scotia; Non Governmental Organization: Canadian Mental Health Association; Media Applicant: The Canadian Press
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Fatality Inquiry Under the Fatality Investigations Act / Decision on Media Access to Expert Reports During the Inquiry (pre Publication Access)
- Outcome
- Request to obtain copies for publication denied; permission granted for supervised on-site review only
- Legal Topics
- Media Access to Court Records, Open Justice, Control of Exhibits, Expert Evidence, Publication Restrictions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Broderick
Acting Inquiry Counsel
Attorney General of Nova Scotia
Attorney General
Joanna Blair and Dr. Hunter Blair
Interested Parties
Nova Scotia Government and General Employees' Union
Union Intervener
Halifax Regional Police
Police
Capital District Health Authority
Health Authority
Dr. Janet MacIntyre
Physician/interested Party
Dr. Stephen Curry
Physician/interested Party
Schizophrenia Society of Nova Scotia
Non Governmental Organization
Canadian Mental Health Association
Non Governmental Organization
The Canadian Press
Media Applicant
Procedural Posture
Fatality Inquiry Under the Fatality Investigations Act / Decision on Media Access to Expert Reports During the Inquiry (pre Publication Access)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the media is entitled to copies of expert reports admitted as exhibits in the inquiry
- 2 How to balance open court principles and freedom of expression with the inquiry's custodial control over exhibits
- 3 Whether unrestricted publication of expert reports would risk misrepresentation or decontextualization of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The court denied the media's request for copies of the expert reports and permitted on-site, supervised review only because the inquiry's custodial control over exhibits, the risk of misrepresentation and decontextualization of expert evidence, and existing public access via webcasting together justify restricting publication and copying while preserving open proceedings.
Court Disposition
Request to obtain copies for publication denied; permission granted for supervised on-site review only
Orders
- The Canadian Press may review the experts' reports at the inquiry offices at a time convenient to the inquiry
- No copies of the reports shall be provided to the Canadian Press
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment