United Kingdom v. Elabd

United Kingdom v. Elabd

On consent of the parties, the Court dismissed the judicial review application as abandoned.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2017 ONCA 983
Parties
Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Applicant: Michael Elabd
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Extradition / Criminal / Application for Judicial Review of Surrender Order (dismissed as Abandoned on Consent)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed as abandoned on consent.
Legal Topics
Surrender Order, Judicial Review, Abandonment, Consent Dismissal
Source Language
en
Criminal Extradition Administrative Law Surrender Order Judicial Review Abandonment Consent Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Respondent

Michael Elabd

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Extradition / Criminal / Application for Judicial Review of Surrender Order (dismissed as Abandoned on Consent)

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's judicial review of the Minister of Justice's surrender order should proceed or be treated as abandoned
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be dismissed on consent

Ratio Decidendi

On consent of the parties, the Court dismissed the judicial review application as abandoned.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed as abandoned on consent.

Orders

  • Judicial review application dismissed as abandoned on consent.