United States v. Wilson

United States v. Wilson

The court dismissed the application for judicial review because, as provided in the applicant's bail order, the application had been abandoned.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2016 ONCA 177
Parties
Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United States of America; Applicant: Michael Hugh Wilson
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Extradition Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Endorsement on Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed as abandoned.
Legal Topics
Surrender Order, Judicial Review, Abandonment Under Bail Conditions
Source Language
en
Criminal Extradition Administrative Law Surrender Order Judicial Review Abandonment Under Bail Conditions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United States of America

Respondent

Michael Hugh Wilson

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Extradition Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Endorsement on Application for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the application for judicial review of the Minister of Justice's surrender order should proceed
  2. 2 Whether the application was abandoned pursuant to the applicant's bail order

Ratio Decidendi

The court dismissed the application for judicial review because, as provided in the applicant's bail order, the application had been abandoned.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed as abandoned.

Orders

  • As provided for in the applicant’s bail order, the application for judicial review is dismissed as abandoned.