Karakas v. General Motors of Canada Limited et al.
The Court agreed with the reasons of Rouleau J. and dismissed the appeal, thereby affirming the Superior Court judgment and fixing costs to the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C42912
- Parties
- Appellant: MICHAEL KARAKAS; NEDELKA KARAKAS; ANNIE KARAKAS; CONSTANTO RAIMONDO; Respondent: GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA LIMITED et al.
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MICHAEL KARAKAS; NEDELKA KARAKAS; ANNIE KARAKAS; CONSTANTO RAIMONDO
Appellant
GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA LIMITED et al.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be allowed
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded and the amount
Ratio Decidendi
The Court agreed with the reasons of Rouleau J. and dismissed the appeal, thereby affirming the Superior Court judgment and fixing costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs to respondent fixed at $10,000 inclusive of G.S.T. and disbursements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Karakas v. General Motors of Canada Limited et al. Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2005-06-15 Docket numbers C42912 Judges Moldaver, Michael James; Armstrong, Robert Patrick; Juriansz, Russell G. Subject Civil Decision Content DATE: 20050615 DOCKET: C42912 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: MICHAEL KARAKAS, NEDELKA KARAKAS, ANNIE KARAKAS and CONSTANTO RAIMONDO (Plaintiff (Appellants)) – and – GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA LIMITED ET AL. BEFORE: MOLDAVER, ARMSTRONG and JURIANSZ JJ.A. COUNSEL: David Cheifetz for the appellants Robert L. Love and Paulette Pommells for the respondent HEARD: June 14, 2005 On appeal from the judgment of Justice Paul S. Rouleau as a judge of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 16, 2004. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] For the reasons of Rouleau J., with which we agree, the appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $10,000 inclusive of G.S.T. and disbursements.