R. v. Kloc
The appeal was dismissed because the Court of Appeal found no error in the sentence that justified intervention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C45436
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Kloc; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Kloc
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was erroneous or otherwise warranted appellate intervention
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the Court of Appeal found no error in the sentence that justified intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Kloc Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2006-09-13 Docket numbers C45436 Judges O’Connor, Dennis; MacPherson, James C.; Gillese, Eileen E. Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20060913 DOCKET: C45436 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) v. MICHAEL KLOC (Appellant) BEFORE: O’CONNOR A.C.J.O., MACPHERSON and GILLESE JJ.A. COUNSEL: Kim Schofield for the appellant Xenia Proestos for the respondent HEARD & ENDORSED: September 11, 2006 On appeal from the sentence entered by Justice McIssac of the Superior Court of Justice dated May 1, 2006. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We see no error in the sentence that justifies this court’s intervention. [2] The appeal is dismissed.