Campbell v. Asaph
Claimant proved work performed and non-receipt of funds; Defendant failed to establish that Claimant was negligent, that the contract allocated risk to Claimant, or that Claimant engaged in willful misconduct; therefore Defendant remains liable for the misdirected e-transfer and must pay the claimed amount.
- Citation
- 2024 NSSM 48
- Parties
- Claimant: Carl Christopher Campbell; Defendant: Michael Leon Asaph
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims / Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; judgment for Claimant in the amount of $2,499.81; no prejudgment interest or costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- E Transfer, Electronic Fraud, Contributory Negligence, Standard of Care, Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carl Christopher Campbell
Claimant
Michael Leon Asaph
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Who bears loss where e-transfer funds are misdirected via scam
- 2 Whether claimant was negligent in protecting electronic communications and banking
- 3 Whether contributory negligence or contract shifts liability for fraudulent payment instructions
Ratio Decidendi
Claimant proved work performed and non-receipt of funds; Defendant failed to establish that Claimant was negligent, that the contract allocated risk to Claimant, or that Claimant engaged in willful misconduct; therefore Defendant remains liable for the misdirected e-transfer and must pay the claimed amount.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; judgment for Claimant in the amount of $2,499.81; no prejudgment interest or costs awarded.
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant $2,499.81
- No prejudgment interest awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment