Campbell v. Asaph

Campbell v. Asaph

Claimant proved work performed and non-receipt of funds; Defendant failed to establish that Claimant was negligent, that the contract allocated risk to Claimant, or that Claimant engaged in willful misconduct; therefore Defendant remains liable for the misdirected e-transfer and must pay the claimed amount.

Citation
2024 NSSM 48
Parties
Claimant: Carl Christopher Campbell; Defendant: Michael Leon Asaph
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Small Claims / Decision
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; judgment for Claimant in the amount of $2,499.81; no prejudgment interest or costs awarded.
Legal Topics
E Transfer, Electronic Fraud, Contributory Negligence, Standard of Care, Damages
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carl Christopher Campbell

Claimant

Michael Leon Asaph

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims / Decision

  1. 1 Who bears loss where e-transfer funds are misdirected via scam
  2. 2 Whether claimant was negligent in protecting electronic communications and banking
  3. 3 Whether contributory negligence or contract shifts liability for fraudulent payment instructions

Ratio Decidendi

Claimant proved work performed and non-receipt of funds; Defendant failed to establish that Claimant was negligent, that the contract allocated risk to Claimant, or that Claimant engaged in willful misconduct; therefore Defendant remains liable for the misdirected e-transfer and must pay the claimed amount.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; judgment for Claimant in the amount of $2,499.81; no prejudgment interest or costs awarded.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Claimant $2,499.81
  • No prejudgment interest awarded