R. v. Rodriguez

R. v. Rodriguez

The trial judge lawfully considered the relevant sentencing factors and reasonably rejected a conditional sentence for the offence of importing cocaine; the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 ONCA 544
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Milagros Saavedra Rodriguez
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
6 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal sentence granted but substantive appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conditional Sentence, Importation of Cocaine, Guilty Plea, Sentence Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Conditional Sentence Importation of Cocaine Guilty Plea Sentence Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Milagros Saavedra Rodriguez

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Whether a conditional sentence was appropriate for the offence of importing cocaine
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge properly considered the appellant's health and guilty plea in sentencing
  3. 3 Whether the rejection of a conditional sentence was reasonable and consistent with appellate jurisprudence

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge lawfully considered the relevant sentencing factors and reasonably rejected a conditional sentence for the offence of importing cocaine; the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal sentence granted but substantive appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal sentence granted
  • Appeal dismissed