TB9-31082
The summons submitted by the Appellant was found fraudulent on the balance of probabilities due to multiple inconsistencies with authoritative country-documentation samples and lack of corroborating evidence that the authorities sought him; combined with country evidence showing relative tolerance for Christian practice in Fuqing, Fujian, these findings negate a serious possibility of persecution and justify dismissing the appeal and upholding the RPD decision that the Appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- TB9-31082
- Parties
- Appellant / Person in Cause: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Decision on Appeal (final)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision upheld
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Country Conditions, Document Authenticity, Credibility Assessment, Protection Claim
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant / Person in Cause
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Decision on Appeal (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summons submitted by the Appellant is authentic or fraudulent
- 2 Whether the Appellant is credible about practising Christianity in China
- 3 Whether country conditions in Fuqing, Fujian support a well-founded fear of persecution
Ratio Decidendi
The summons submitted by the Appellant was found fraudulent on the balance of probabilities due to multiple inconsistencies with authoritative country-documentation samples and lack of corroborating evidence that the authorities sought him; combined with country evidence showing relative tolerance for Christian practice in Fuqing, Fujian, these findings negate a serious possibility of persecution and justify dismissing the appeal and upholding the RPD decision that the Appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; RPD findings affirmed; Appellant determined not to be a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment