MA5-05771
Claim dismissed because claimant's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated and documentary country evidence did not establish a reasonable chance that an ordinary UNP volunteer like the claimant would be personally subjected to persecution, torture or death; therefore he is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MA5-05771
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection (convention Refugee Claim) / Decision on Refugee Protection Claim
- Outcome
- Claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Risk of Torture, Political Opinion, Credibility, Well‑founded Fear, Objective Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (convention Refugee Claim) / Decision on Refugee Protection Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether claimant faces a personal risk of torture or risk to life on return
- 3 Credibility and corroboration of claimant's account
Ratio Decidendi
Claim dismissed because claimant's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated and documentary country evidence did not establish a reasonable chance that an ordinary UNP volunteer like the claimant would be personally subjected to persecution, torture or death; therefore he is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected
Orders
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and is not a person in need of protection; removal to Sri Lanka may proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment