TA7-08293
The claimant's fear arises from generalized criminal violence by Chimères/zenglendos and lacks nexus to a Convention ground or a personalized risk; returnees are not a protected particular social group and documentary and case law show the risk is generalized, therefore claim fails under ss.96 and 97 of IRPA.
- Citation
- TA7-08293
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX-XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (irpa Ss.96 and 97) / Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim denied
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Nexus to Convention Grounds, Generalized Risk, Country Conditions, Criminal Organizations, Torture, Credibility
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX-XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (irpa Ss.96 and 97) / Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee under s.96 of the IRPA
- 2 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection under s.97(1)(a) and s.97(1)(b)(ii) of the IRPA
- 3 Whether the harm feared is individualized or a generalized risk
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's fear arises from generalized criminal violence by Chimères/zenglendos and lacks nexus to a Convention ground or a personalized risk; returnees are not a protected particular social group and documentary and case law show the risk is generalized, therefore claim fails under ss.96 and 97 of IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment