TA7-09735
The tribunal found the claimant not credible regarding the alleged raid and being wanted by the PSB and, on the balance of probabilities given the country evidence showing no recent arrests of lay Christians in Fujian, concluded there is no serious possibility of persecution; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- TA7-09735
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (reasons and Decision Delivered June 11, 2009)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility, Persecution for Religion, House Churches, Country Conditions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (reasons and Decision Delivered June 11, 2009)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
- 3 Credibility of the claimant's account of membership in an underground church and being sought by the PSB
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found the claimant not credible regarding the alleged raid and being wanted by the PSB and, on the balance of probabilities given the country evidence showing no recent arrests of lay Christians in Fujian, concluded there is no serious possibility of persecution; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment