VA8-02316
Claimants rejected because credibility findings, contradictions and documentary evidence failed to establish that incidents were connected to a Convention ground or that they face a personalized risk distinct from generalized criminal violence in El Salvador; therefore claims under section 96 and subsection 97(1) are dismissed.
- Citation
- VA8-02316
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX; Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection RPD Hearing / Decision Rendered Orally March 1, 2010; Written Reasons March 23, 2010
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed; refugee protection and protection under subsection 97(1) denied.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection (s.97(1)), Credibility Findings, Nexus to Convention Grounds, Generalized Violence and Public Order
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection RPD Hearing / Decision Rendered Orally March 1, 2010; Written Reasons March 23, 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are Convention refugees under section 96 of the IRPA
- 2 Whether claimants face a personalized risk under subsection 97(1) IRPA
- 3 Credibility and consistency of testimony and documentary evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants rejected because credibility findings, contradictions and documentary evidence failed to establish that incidents were connected to a Convention ground or that they face a personalized risk distinct from generalized criminal violence in El Salvador; therefore claims under section 96 and subsection 97(1) are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed; refugee protection and protection under subsection 97(1) denied.
Orders
- Claims dismissed
- No protection under section 96 or subsection 97(1) granted; written reasons issued March 23, 2010
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment