TA8-19063

TA8-19063

Claimants' allegations lacked credibility and documentary evidence established that Christianity is recognized and that Jordanian authorities can and do provide protection against tribal violence; therefore the claimants failed to prove a real risk of persecution or torture on a Convention ground and their claims are rejected.

Citation
TA8-19063
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. NXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX); Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX); Claimant: XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX); Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / De Novo Decision Hearing and Reasons/decision
Outcome
Claims dismissed; claimants found not to be Convention refugees and not to be persons in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, State Protection, Credibility Findings, Religious Persecution, Tribal Violence, Risk of Torture
Source Language
English
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Convention Refugee State Protection Credibility Findings Religious Persecution Tribal Violence +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. NXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX)

Claimant

XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX)

Claimant

XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX)

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / De Novo Decision Hearing and Reasons/decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claimants are Convention refugees
  2. 2 Whether claimants are persons in need of protection
  3. 3 Whether there is nexus to a Convention ground (religion)

Ratio Decidendi

Claimants' allegations lacked credibility and documentary evidence established that Christianity is recognized and that Jordanian authorities can and do provide protection against tribal violence; therefore the claimants failed to prove a real risk of persecution or torture on a Convention ground and their claims are rejected.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed; claimants found not to be Convention refugees and not to be persons in need of protection.

Orders

  • Claims dismissed
  • No refugee protection or protection order granted