MB1-05111
The panel found the claimant was subjected to isolated attacks by extremist individuals but that those acts, in the context of Latvia's laws, societal position and available state protection, do not amount to persecution for a Convention ground; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MB1-05111
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Refugee protection claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Persecution, State Protection, Ethnic Discrimination, Political Opinion, Hate Crimes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee under section 96 and subsection 97(1) IRPA for persecution based on political opinion and/or ethnicity
- 2 Whether attacks by extremist nationalists constitute persecution
- 3 Whether the Latvian state offers adequate protection or whether state acquiescence exists
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant was subjected to isolated attacks by extremist individuals but that those acts, in the context of Latvia's laws, societal position and available state protection, do not amount to persecution for a Convention ground; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Refugee protection claim rejected
Orders
- Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment