TB2-11996
On a balance of probabilities the panel rejected the claimant's account as lacking credibility and found the documentary and forensic evidence showed suspects' arrest independent of his testimony; there was no persuasive evidence of threats or failed state protection and the claimant's delay in filing undermined subjective fear—therefore the claim fails under IRPA sections 96 and 97.
- Citation
- TB2-11996
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection (irpa Sections 96, 97) / Hearing and Final Decision (reasons Issued)
- Outcome
- Claim for refugee protection rejected
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Well Founded Fear, Credibility Assessment, State Protection, Delay in Claiming
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (irpa Sections 96, 97) / Hearing and Final Decision (reasons Issued)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee under IRPA
- 2 Whether the claimant has a subjective and objectively well‑founded fear of persecution or harm
- 3 Whether state protection was unavailable or inadequate
Ratio Decidendi
On a balance of probabilities the panel rejected the claimant's account as lacking credibility and found the documentary and forensic evidence showed suspects' arrest independent of his testimony; there was no persuasive evidence of threats or failed state protection and the claimant's delay in filing undermined subjective fear—therefore the claim fails under IRPA sections 96 and 97.
Court Disposition
Claim for refugee protection rejected
Orders
- Refugee protection claim rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment