TA7-12101
Because the claimant previously received international protection in the United States and voluntarily relinquished that protection by leaving, he is not in need of Canadian protection and therefore is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of IRPA.
- Citation
- TA7-12101
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee Determination, Section 97 Protection, Safe Third Country / Prior Protection, Voluntary Relinquishment of Protection, Religion, Nationality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether claimant is a person described in section 97 of IRPA
- 3 Whether claimant's prior protection in the United States bars his Canadian claim
Ratio Decidendi
Because the claimant previously received international protection in the United States and voluntarily relinquished that protection by leaving, he is not in need of Canadian protection and therefore is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Orders
- Claim dismissed; not a Convention refugee and not a person described in section 97 of IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment