TA7-12101

TA7-12101

Because the claimant previously received international protection in the United States and voluntarily relinquished that protection by leaving, he is not in need of Canadian protection and therefore is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of IRPA.

Citation
TA7-12101
Parties
Claimant: XXXXXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection / Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee Determination, Section 97 Protection, Safe Third Country / Prior Protection, Voluntary Relinquishment of Protection, Religion, Nationality
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection / Hearing and Decision

  1. 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 Whether claimant is a person described in section 97 of IRPA
  3. 3 Whether claimant's prior protection in the United States bars his Canadian claim

Ratio Decidendi

Because the claimant previously received international protection in the United States and voluntarily relinquished that protection by leaving, he is not in need of Canadian protection and therefore is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of IRPA.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person described in section 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Orders

  • Claim dismissed; not a Convention refugee and not a person described in section 97 of IRPA