TB0-12237

TB0-12237

The claimant's evidence contained significant, unexplained inconsistencies on central elements of his claim, corroborative documents did not establish political persecution, and his account contained implausibilities (including lawful departure on his own passport); therefore the panel found no credible evidence that he is a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection and dismissed the claim.

Citation
TB0-12237
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Credibility, Torture, Arbitrary Detention, Persecution, Corroboration, Failed Refugee Claimant, Visa and Passport Issues
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
  3. 3 Assessment of claimant credibility

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's evidence contained significant, unexplained inconsistencies on central elements of his claim, corroborative documents did not establish political persecution, and his account contained implausibilities (including lawful departure on his own passport); therefore the panel found no credible evidence that he is a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection and dismissed the claim.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection

Orders

  • Refugee protection claim rejected; no protection granted