TA7-10810

TA7-10810

On the balance of probabilities the claimant could safely relocate to and live in Mexico City without a serious possibility of persecution and it would not be unreasonable to expect him to do so; therefore he is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Citation
TA7-10810
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
24 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee, Credibility, Country Conditions, Union Harassment
Source Language
English
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Internal Flight Alternative Convention Refugee Credibility Country Conditions Union Harassment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
  3. 3 Whether an internal flight alternative exists in Mexico City

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities the claimant could safely relocate to and live in Mexico City without a serious possibility of persecution and it would not be unreasonable to expect him to do so; therefore he is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection