VA8-03588

VA8-03588

The claimant's testimony and supporting documents were found not wholly credible and lacked objective, trustworthy evidence of a serious possibility of persecution; given the change of circumstances with the claimant's political party in power, adequate state protection is available, therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Citation
VA8-03588
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Refugee Protection, Credibility Assessment, State Protection, Political Opinion, Political Opposition, Country Conditions, Document Authenticity
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
  3. 3 Credibility of the claimant's testimony and documents

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's testimony and supporting documents were found not wholly credible and lacked objective, trustworthy evidence of a serious possibility of persecution; given the change of circumstances with the claimant's political party in power, adequate state protection is available, therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.

Orders

  • Claim rejected; protection claim dismissed.