CA4-00446
Although HIV positive status qualifies as membership in a particular social group, the evidence did not establish on a balance of probabilities that the claimant or his family would face persecution, systematic denial of medical treatment, torture, a real risk to life, or cruel and unusual treatment upon return to Zimbabwe; therefore they are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- CA4-00446
- Parties
- Principal Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Spouse/claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Child/claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Refugee Protection Officer: O. Oyelese; Designated Representative: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Hearing / Hearing/decision
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and are not persons in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Status Determination, Particular Social Group, Hiv/aids, Non Refoulement, Medical Treatment, Protection From Torture, Humanitarian and Compassionate Considerations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Principal Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Spouse/claimant
XXXXX XXXXX
Child/claimant
O. Oyelese
Refugee Protection Officer
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Designated Representative
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Hearing / Hearing/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HIV positive status constitutes membership in a particular social group for refugee protection
- 2 Whether claimant faces persecution by reason of membership in that group
- 3 Whether medical treatment is available in Zimbabwe and whether it will be withheld
Ratio Decidendi
Although HIV positive status qualifies as membership in a particular social group, the evidence did not establish on a balance of probabilities that the claimant or his family would face persecution, systematic denial of medical treatment, torture, a real risk to life, or cruel and unusual treatment upon return to Zimbabwe; therefore they are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and are not persons in need of protection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment