TA3-13365

TA3-13365

Claimant's claim was rejected because he failed to prove a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground due to material omissions and credibility concerns, available state protection and a viable internal flight alternative, and absence of evidence of a real risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment.

Citation
TA3-13365
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (irpa Ss.96 and 97(1)) / Hearing Refugee Protection Division Decision (rehearing)
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Religious Belief, Delay, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility, Convention Refugee, Risk of Torture, Person in Need of Protection
Source Language
English
Immigration Refugee Protection Administrative Law Religious Belief Delay State Protection Internal Flight Alternative Credibility +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim (irpa Ss.96 and 97(1)) / Hearing Refugee Protection Division Decision (rehearing)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claimant has a well‑founded fear of persecution for a Convention ground (religion)
  2. 2 Credibility of claimant's testimony and omissions in PIF
  3. 3 Availability and adequacy of state protection in Pakistan

Ratio Decidendi

Claimant's claim was rejected because he failed to prove a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground due to material omissions and credibility concerns, available state protection and a viable internal flight alternative, and absence of evidence of a real risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.