TC1-03428
Although the appeal accepted new evidence that raised serious credibility questions, the decision-maker found the respondents credible on balance: the tribunal accepted that fraudulent Gambian passports and documents can be obtained, accepted respondents' affidavits and certain documentary rebuttals, drew negative...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- TC1-03428
- Parties
- Principal Respondent: XXXX XXXX; Adult Associate Respondent: XXXX XXXX; Minor Associate Respondent: XXXX XXXX; Appellant: Minister (Appellant)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Reasons and Decision on Appeal; Oral Hearing Held on New Evidence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed that the respondents are Convention refugees.
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Identity Documents, New Evidence Admissibility, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Fraudulent Documents, Oral Hearing Discretion
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Respondent
XXXX XXXX
Adult Associate Respondent
XXXX XXXX
Minor Associate Respondent
Minister (Appellant)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Reasons and Decision on Appeal; Oral Hearing Held on New Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether new evidence submitted on appeal undermines the respondents identities and credibility
- 2 Whether the identity documents presented by parties are genuine
- 3 Whether the respondents remain credible despite omissions about travel and use of false passports
Ratio Decidendi
Although the appeal accepted new evidence that raised serious credibility questions, the decision-maker found the respondents credible on balance: the tribunal accepted that fraudulent Gambian passports and documents can be obtained, accepted respondents' affidavits and certain documentary rebuttals, drew negative inferences for unexplained omissions about 2017 travel but concluded those omissions did not rebut the presumption of truth of their sworn evidence; accordingly the RPD decision that the respondents are Convention refugees was confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed that the respondents are Convention refugees.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed; respondents recognized as Convention refugees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment