TB7-16838
The panel accepted the claimant's identity and credibility on a balance of probabilities, found state protection and internal relocation unavailable for a Tibetan follower of the Dalai Lama, and determined Article 1E did not apply because the claimant had renounced U.S. permanent residence prior to arrival in Canada; therefore the claimant is a Convention refugee and the claim is allowed.
- Citation
- TB7-16838
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada); Decision Maker: D. Willard
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee.
- Legal Topics
- Article 1 E Exclusion, Credibility and Identity, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee Determination, Program Integrity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
D. Willard
Decision Maker
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Exclusion under Article 1E (1951 Convention)
- 2 Identity and civil status
- 3 Credibility of claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The panel accepted the claimant's identity and credibility on a balance of probabilities, found state protection and internal relocation unavailable for a Tibetan follower of the Dalai Lama, and determined Article 1E did not apply because the claimant had renounced U.S. permanent residence prior to arrival in Canada; therefore the claimant is a Convention refugee and the claim is allowed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment