TB7-16838

TB7-16838

The panel accepted the claimant's identity and credibility on a balance of probabilities, found state protection and internal relocation unavailable for a Tibetan follower of the Dalai Lama, and determined Article 1E did not apply because the claimant had renounced U.S. permanent residence prior to arrival in Canada; therefore the claimant is a Convention refugee and the claim is allowed.

Citation
TB7-16838
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada); Decision Maker: D. Willard
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Decision After Hearing
Outcome
Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee.
Legal Topics
Article 1 E Exclusion, Credibility and Identity, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee Determination, Program Integrity
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister (Canada)

Respondent

D. Willard

Decision Maker

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Decision After Hearing

  1. 1 Exclusion under Article 1E (1951 Convention)
  2. 2 Identity and civil status
  3. 3 Credibility of claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The panel accepted the claimant's identity and credibility on a balance of probabilities, found state protection and internal relocation unavailable for a Tibetan follower of the Dalai Lama, and determined Article 1E did not apply because the claimant had renounced U.S. permanent residence prior to arrival in Canada; therefore the claimant is a Convention refugee and the claim is allowed.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee.