TB2-04157
The panel found the claimant not credible on material aspects (short, non-cohabiting relationships, lack of corroboration, implausibility of ongoing interest or serious threats) and therefore concluded she did not establish a nexus to a Convention ground or that there were good grounds for a well-founded fear of persecution; claim rejected under ss.96 and 97(1) IRPA.
- Citation
- TB2-04157
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (merits Hearing)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and is not a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee Status, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility Assessment, Gender Related Persecution, State Protection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (merits Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Credibility of the claimant
- 2 Nexus to a Convention ground (gender/sexual orientation)
- 3 Whether there are good grounds for a well-founded fear of persecution
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant not credible on material aspects (short, non-cohabiting relationships, lack of corroboration, implausibility of ongoing interest or serious threats) and therefore concluded she did not establish a nexus to a Convention ground or that there were good grounds for a well-founded fear of persecution; claim rejected under ss.96 and 97(1) IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and is not a person in need of protection
Orders
- Claim rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment