MB7-15824
The claimant failed to establish on a balance of probabilities a personal risk of persecution distinct from the general Haitian population: his alleged persecutors no longer have an interest in him (leader deceased), his fear is generalized insecurity shared by many, his Venezuelan status was temporary and not equivalent to nationality (no Article 1E exclusion), and overall there is no credible basis for the claim under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA.
- Citation
- MB7-15824
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Decision and Reasons
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection; claim has no credible basis under subsection 107(2) IRPA.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee Status, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility, Article 1 E Exclusion, Generalized Criminality, Diaspora Returnees Risk
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision and Reasons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is excluded under Article 1E/section 98 IRPA due to status in Venezuela
- 2 Whether claimant established a personal risk of persecution under section 96 IRPA
- 3 Whether claimant established a risk to life/torture/cruel and unusual treatment under subsection 97(1) IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to establish on a balance of probabilities a personal risk of persecution distinct from the general Haitian population: his alleged persecutors no longer have an interest in him (leader deceased), his fear is generalized insecurity shared by many, his Venezuelan status was temporary and not equivalent to nationality (no Article 1E exclusion), and overall there is no credible basis for the claim under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection; claim has no credible basis under subsection 107(2) IRPA.
Orders
- Refugee protection claim rejected.
- Claim has no credible basis pursuant to subsection 107(2) of the IRPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment