TB7-05348

TB7-05348

The panel concluded that the claimant's evidence was not credible due to multiple inconsistencies and numerous demonstrably fraudulent or highly dubious documents; because the claimant failed to prove identity, membership in SCNC or a real risk of persecution and did submit a clearly fraudulent identity card, the RPD rejected the claim and declared it manifestly unfounded under IRPA s.107.1.

Citation
TB7-05348
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX XXXX); Respondent: Minister (Canada)
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Hearing and Decision (reasons for Decision)
Outcome
Claim rejected; claim declared manifestly unfounded; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Credibility, Document Authenticity, Manifestly Unfounded Claim, Political Opinion, Persecution, State Protection
Source Language
English
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Credibility Document Authenticity Manifestly Unfounded Claim Political Opinion Persecution +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX XXXX)

Claimant

Minister (Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Hearing and Decision (reasons for Decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Claimant identity and citizenship
  2. 2 Credibility of claimant's testimony
  3. 3 Authenticity of supporting documents

Ratio Decidendi

The panel concluded that the claimant's evidence was not credible due to multiple inconsistencies and numerous demonstrably fraudulent or highly dubious documents; because the claimant failed to prove identity, membership in SCNC or a real risk of persecution and did submit a clearly fraudulent identity card, the RPD rejected the claim and declared it manifestly unfounded under IRPA s.107.1.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claim declared manifestly unfounded; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.

Orders

  • Claim rejected by Refugee Protection Division
  • Claim declared manifestly unfounded under IRPA s.107.1