TB5-05648
On an independent assessment the RAD found, on a balance of probabilities, that a reasonable and accessible internal flight alternative exists in Lagos for the appellants and that they failed to show a serious possibility of persecution or risk to life/cruel and unusual treatment there; accordingly the appeals are dismissed and the RPD decision is confirmed under s.111(1)(a) IRPA.
- Citation
- TB5-05648
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Appellant (spouse): XXXX XXXX; Appellant (minor Child): XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal (rad Review of RPD Decision) / Appeal Heard and Decided by Refugee Appeal Division (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed under section 111(1)(a) of IRPA
- Legal Topics
- Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Findings, Gender Based Persecution, Female Genital Mutilation, Standard of Review / Hybrid Appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX
Appellant (spouse)
XXXX XXXX
Appellant (minor Child)
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (rad Review of RPD Decision) / Appeal Heard and Decided by Refugee Appeal Division (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a viable and reasonable internal flight alternative (IFA) exists in Lagos for the appellants
- 2 Whether the RPD's adverse credibility findings were unreasonable and determinative
- 3 Application of Chairperson's Gender Guidelines to assess IFA for female claimant
Ratio Decidendi
On an independent assessment the RAD found, on a balance of probabilities, that a reasonable and accessible internal flight alternative exists in Lagos for the appellants and that they failed to show a serious possibility of persecution or risk to life/cruel and unusual treatment there; accordingly the appeals are dismissed and the RPD decision is confirmed under s.111(1)(a) IRPA.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed under section 111(1)(a) of IRPA
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated April 23, 2015 is confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment